Cardinals chat with Derrick Goold

Cardinals chat with Derrick Goold

Bring your Cardinals questions and comments, and talk to Post-Dispatch baseball writer Derrick Goold in a live chat starting at 11 a.m.




  • I loved your article featuring Brebbia and Sheriff and the financial straights that minor leaguers have to navigate through. Do you think there will be a push to restructure the pay structure to limit the amount of control teams have over younger players in the next labor contract, especially since the vets are getting a colder shoulder towards the end of their careers now?
  • Great question, and thanks for the compliment on the story. It was one I wanted to tell -- and was just trying to find the best way I could to humanize it, relate it, and have it be about people, not dollars and laws and labor agreements. There has been some discussion about slashing the years of control that teams have over players so that it's not four in the minors, the three more possible, six in the majors, and the first 10+ years of their professional life. That's the Tommy Pham Dilemma, right? The idea would be to create a free market for players earlier in their playing careers and thus offset the low wages of the minors by giving them a chance, even at that level, to command higher salaries through what's now called the six-year free agent process. It's a longshot, though, for many reasons. First, the union represents the players on the 40-man roster and that's why they're higher paid. The union does not represent all of the professional players. Second, MLB and the owners are now emboldened by the protection they've received in the omnibus spending bill and the ability they have to wield millions in lobbying to save millions in spending.
  •   
    Here's the story mentioned in the previous question, the first of this year's Post-Dispatch Cardinals Insiders: 

    Cardinals Insider: Playing for pennies in the minors

    stltoday.comNewest Cards share stories of lean days. "Going with the flow is an imperative life skill,” says relief pitcher John Brebbia.
  • Say you trade for Machado... does he move to Short stop? Or do you move Dejong to third? Would cause interesting roster construction
  • Say you have to give up Jack Flaherty and/or Jordan Hicks to get Manny Machado -- now you're really talking about some interesting roster construction. Does Alex Reyes have to start? Does Bud Norris get his first multi-year deal to be the longterm reliever Hicks could be? Goodness. Now there's a question.
  • DG, you're the man. Strikeout numbers for the league are getting crazy. We all know what got us here, what would trigger a change?
  • Umpires. I still believe they can have a bigger role in improving pace of play and limiting strikeouts, absolutely. Call a bigger strike zone, get the game going. One element of the strikeout binge that probably should get more conversation is the role shifts play in it. I'm not one who thinks that shifts should be outlawed. Let the NBA keep its iso-offense and their illegal defenses. What I think should get a hearing is how hitters who mash into shifts are suddenly more accepting of a strikeout rather then constantly beating the ball into the shift. That to me is interesting. It would seem that a correction would start with hitters being more deft at handling the pitch the other way -- and umpires calling that zone would -- and this is just my bet -- hasten the arrival of that approach.
  • What do you make of Matheny getting Hicks up 3 different times Friday night without putting him in. Speaks to overall concern over bullpen use by Matheny?
  • It also speaks to how Hicks may not be used in games because he's warmed up to get in a game that never sees him. This is something that the Cardinals have tried to bake into their approach, honestly. It hasn't been a mandate yet -- if he warms, he pitches -- but it's come close. Matheny has suggested that there are times when a pitcher is hot and has to be used even if the game goes upside down on them or (as was the case Sunday) the Cardinals get a bigger lead than they had when the pitcher started warming up. They're going to be cautious with Hicks and we've already see this with the time he gets to recover from multi-inning appearances, and it wouldn't be a shock if we start seeing that drift into how he's treated when he warms and doesn't pitch, or the rules regarding how often he warms before he has to appear in that game, no matter what.
  • Why would the Cards have scouts at the Rays’ game?
  • Because they have scouts all over the country whose job it is to see as many teams as possible. That's pretty standard for teams, unless they've scrapped the whole advance scouting thing. The Rays are a team that has interesting talent, has been a team the Cardinals have talked to about trades in the past, and are a major-league team with future free agents that will have to be evaluated if the Cardinals want to sign them. But let me also point out who the Rays played this past week:
     
    -- Chicago White Sox
    -- Minnesota Twins
     
    Let's pause a moment and consider these are major-league teams that the Cardinals don't often have reason to advance scout for the purpose of playing. Sure, they scout for the purpsoe of talent evaluation, but not so much for actually having to play on the field. Let's go now to the Cardinals' upcoming schedule and see 
     
    May 1 & 2 vs. Chicago White Sox
    May 7 & 8 vs. Minnesota Twins
    May 15 & 16 vs. Minnesota Twins
     
    I think we can accurately deduce that some advance scouting is going on. Schedule never lies.
  • Hi Derrick, a lot has been made about the stuff of Jordan Hicks, but he has struck out only 6 of 47 batters faced (he's gone 13 straight batters without a strikeout), is this a concern with the organization or was this to be expected?
  • Excellent question. This is sort of the next evolution of his game, and it's something that the he and the Cardinals talked about before the start of spring training, and certainly before that. Hicks has a power sinker that goes 99-102 and has movement. It's going to get weak contact -- and some swings and misses. But lots of weak contact as hitters gear up to hit heat -- and then it moves. That's to be expected with his pitch. What the Cardinals and Hicks want to see him do is start elevating and finding those strikeouts up in the zone. Ryan Helsley, for example, has that high spin rate fastball that pops as it arrives and that works well in the upper registers of the strike zone. Hicks may not need the high spin rate because he has such velocity, but it would help get that pitch up just above the strike zone -- really, like the one he threw Votto, honestly. Instead of Hicks doing this in the minors and arriving with that pitch, he's able to get that work in the majors, so it's a bit of a pinch right: He needs to get outs where it counts, and hitters here are going to be able to hit that velocity, but not his movement. The strikeouts will come. He's just going to learn how to get them on the job.
  • My "dumpster-dive" comment was preceded with "so-called" because that's what the BFIB called it when it was made. Clearly, they had scouted his work in Japan and had a good feel for what they were getting.
  • Gotcha. They certainly analyzed his work in Japan. This was a video/analytics find for the Cardinals. They did not dispatch a scout to see Mikolas actually pitch.
  • I know this question gets asked fairly frequently but without a current spot on any MILB roster it is difficult to know: Any update on the progress or lack thereof by Delvin Perez?
  • He's in extended spring training, playing away. There aren't box scores for those games, and the Cardinals keep stats, but don't often reveal them, or not in their entirety. The games are unofficial, the rules often malleable, and the purpose is entirely to get the players reps, reps, reps are game speed. Brett Cecil, for example, will be with the extended teams starting Tuesday to get some innings in and do so under controlled conditions. He can throw six outs an inning, if he wants. They can put a lineup of five consecutive lefties against him, if he wants. Same goes for Perez. If the Cardinals want him to get all the reps one day in the field, he can just play the field at game speed and do his hitting in the cage. This is where he is. They want him to work as much off the field to improve his strength and his approach at the plate as he works on the field. This is a big year for him, sure, but it's not a big April for him. The bigger tell will be August. Does he get to a full-season club, does he play in Peoria before the season's end. He's still just 19. Won't be 20 until November. So it's not like he's lagging behind his peers.
  • Interesting piece this morning by Ben on the former Cardinals. Do you have any idea why Leake did so poorly with the Cardinals, but as soon as he got to Seattle he started to perform?
  • I would imagine it has something to do with the defense behind him and the comfort he has in the clubhouse. In so, so many ways Mike Leake came to feel like he was an odd fit for the Cardinals -- you'll recall he wanted to sign with Arizona, San Francisco, and then was convinced to come to the Cardinals -- and eventually the Cardinals had to agree.
  • Is it possible Waino is downplaying his DL stint? Perhaps he knows the end is near, and this could be it, with so many pitchers on the horizon like Flaherty?
  • That would be entirely out of character and not at all like the Adam Wainwright who I have covered from the day he arrived in the majors. It wouldn't fit the personality he's proven to have at all.
  • No soup for you if you criticize Matt Carpenter. DG will have no criticism of Carpenter even if you point out the obvious. If you want your question answered better say anything bad about Carpenter.
  • Huh? I will give you this -- it is a good day for soup, man. Chilly. Rainy. Perfect day for a little grilled cheese, tomato soup, and good baseball talk about warped urban legends that flourish in only the darkest corners of message boards and yet grow because they don't see the light.
  • The Leake comfort in the clubhouse thing — you've alluded to it a few times. What's the deal there? Just didn't get along with the guys?
  • He talked about it. He was rather candid about how he wasn't a guy that had a set schedule between starts and was thrown into the mix of a group that had everything scheduled. The approach that the Cardinals celebrate -- the one set by Hentgen, continued by Morris and Carpenter, and then handed to Wainwright, and so on -- was new to him, and he wasn't sure how he would fit into it. Heck, on one of his first days of spring training, I sat with him for 45 minutes as he explained how he wanted to take a step back, watch before he spoke, and purposefully not engage until he had a better feel for his teammates because he wondered how he would fit in. Heck, it was even in the headline for that first story. Leake was sardonic, dry, and had some Rolen-like tendencies when it came to be just a contrarian. Most of all, what he lacked was the defense needed behind him --- or the trust in that defense to perform. Not all personalities fit all the time. It's probably like any offense, and it was discussed here: 

    Fun-loving Leake looks for a good fit with Cardinals

    stltoday.comAfter several stressful seasons, 'I'm getting back to where it's fun,' pitcher says
  • Do you think the cardinals have too much flexibility on there infield? Wouldn’t MM be better with players who have fixed spots?
  • I don't think so. That's not the modern game, and there's reason for that. We're not seeing the 162-player anymore, and the roster the Cardinals have really only has two fixed-position infielders, DeJong and Wong. That's because DeJong is the only true shortstop on the team, and Wong's single position is second. This is the toolbox the Cardinals have.
  • Who do the Cardinals have in the minors that can play the infield, given the Cardinals poor defensive infield?
  • Edmundo Sosa. Alex Mejia. Max Schrock. Those are some of the infielders available.
  • Hey DG, when talking about shifts it is crazy to me that there hasn’t been a push to learn to hit the ball the other way. Carpenter (who I like) seems to be unable to do it which has forced him to be a .250 hitter. I would think it’s coming sooner rather than later, do you agree?
  • I don't think it's all that unusual that there hasn't been a shift. And I'm glad you brought this up because I can expand on point the way I should have earlier in the chat. The game is always going to go where the money is, right? Velocity pays. Saves pay. Power pays. And strikeouts don't hurt. When it comes to beating the shift, are players rewarded for feathering the ball the other way and improving their batting average or are they rewarded for hitting the ball where the shift cannot get it -- over the fence, or off it. Salaries tell us the answer. So there does need to be a correction there, too. We're seeing it with middle-relief. The Andrew Millers of the world and elsewhere are showing that high-dollar relievers don't need saves to show their worth. They can change games whether they ever see the ninth inning of a three-run game against the 7-8-PH and get the same. There's got to be a direction that the game goes with the position players as well. Jason Heyward showed a WAR player with defense creating that WAR can get big dollars. Perhaps we'll see A.J. Pollock rewrite how players are viewed for their ability to not ... make ... outs ... and not just when they drive the ball through the wall or over a shift, etc.
  • When are Cecil and Sam Tui coming back and where will they be sent
  • They are on their way to a rehab assignment with Memphis, at last check. Rick Hummel will have an updated on their work in Tuesday's newspaper.
  • What’s your opinion of games only on Facebook?
  • Trying something new. Maybe give the chat a little levity.
  • No soup for you if you criticize Matt
  • Actually, it's interesting. I do have some almonds here to snack on and I still have some coffee, so while there is no Soup, there is actually Soup to Nuts, if you will.
  • regarding the poll, he perhaps should have tried to make contact, but the facts are, Hicks struck him out twice, but just didn't get the call, any other hitter other than Votto is probably rung up
Powered by ScribbleLive Content Marketing Software Platform