He is getting better in the outfield, but defense is not his strong suit.
The only way moving No, 91 makes sense is if the team can upgrade its defense in a big way with those cap dollars.
Actually, the middle relievers have been very good, very consistent of late.
Got hit in the hand by a pitch.
The reality is he has a contract, so the Blues have little choice but to send him back out as the No. 1. They can't pay two No. 1 goaltenders with their cap scenario.
The Cardinals have some good prospects who aren't off the don't-trade list. But the trouble with trading for a huge impact pitcher is that right now there none on the market.
Those are four great head coaches. For their work here, I'd rank the Berube, Coach Q, Bowman and then Hitchcock. But four of the greats.
That would be a great add. The Cardinals would have no trouble trading in the division to get him.
Doug Armstrong likes to have seasoned hockey men around the team. This reminds me of his use of Larry Robinson, albeit in a lesser role. You can never have too much experience when it comes to leading a team.
I like it fine because my daughter played fast-pitch softball and I got used to it there. Some players are OK with it because the alternative of playing 17 innings some nights is not appealing.
I am a big Dakota Joshua fan, but built real value for himself as an unrestricted free agent.
Pallante excelled in that role and Liberatore has been groomed to be a Matz-like starter. And earlier this year the Cardinals felt Woodford's slider lost its bite.
OK, that's it for now. Thanks everyone. See you next week.
I don't care what Steve Weeks leaked out about Vladi still wanting a trade. Last year he got paid 9.5 mill this year it's only 5 million. Cap hit is still 7.5. Anyway keeping him gives us the best chance to win this coming year. What would you get for him as a rental? Nothing comparable to Vladi's production in a walk year.