Join columnist Jeff Gordon for his live St. Louis sports chat at 1 p.m. Friday
Bring your Cards, Blues, Mizzou, SLU and MLS questions and comments, and talk to columnist Jeff Gordon in his weekly live chat.
3rd & 7 37yd
3rd & 7 37yd
B
S
O
close
close

-





-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Jeff,
For years-and-years many of your weekly Cardinal fans have moaned about the lack of power that delivers 20+ homers and 80+ RBI's! Isn't this the production formula that Gorman and Yepez deliver? Why give up on Nolan? Fans, if he ends up in a place like Cincy, he'd power away and become a star. Don't give up on young talent. Seasoning and patience please! -
Fair point. Josh Bell had a .784 OPS last year. Could Yepez and Gorman settle in and produce something like that for very little cost? Either Yepez or Gorman could get moved in the right deal, but that deal would have to be a big impact play to clear out young power potential. Maybe Murphy is a big enough play for that.
-
-
-
-
-
-
The trouble with Parayko and Mikkola together at even strength is their mobility, rush defense and puck-moving. As penalty killers, they can use their size, clear bodies and block shots. They just have to clear pucks, not make great outlet passes -- something Mikkola is not great at. Also, I can use using them together for defensive zone starts late in periods for the same reason.
-
-
-
I did overlap with Harry, but he was staying in Beverly Hills for the most part back then. He would randomly send me newspaper clips without any sort of explanation and expect me to connect the dots. Harry was quite the character.Keenan let the success he had in New York get to him and he carried himself like cross between King and a third-world dictator. His postgame news conference could turned into heated exchanges and we had fun goading him with remarks that Brett Hull had for reporters. Iron Mike got a little carried away here.
-
Gordo it’s pretty easy for fans and chatters to play Junior GM’s and propose all sorts of trades. Many it seems have already given up on Nolan Gorman after less than one stellar season. He has been talked about for YEARS now and is the always discussed LH hitter the team seems to lack. Do you get the sense the Cardinals are already ready to move on from him and include him in a trade? Thanks and I look forward to your comment.
-
-
Let me try this again, another way. I felt that the Cardinals were the 6th best team in the NL playoffs last year. If in either of the other divisions, they would have struggled to play .500 ball. They have to replace Pujols, the leadership of Molina, and Quintana, and will need to have a great offseason to do so with the $20 million available. Any improvement will have to come from improvements from players on last year’s roster (Carlson, O’Neill, others) or the arrival of prospects from the minors. Is that about where we are?
-
I would expect multiple additions from the outside, more subtractions of players you saw last year and, yes, some promotions. Better health from Matz, Flaherty, Hicks and O'Neill could also go a long way (assuming they stay). And as always, the team will look to add talent as needed in season.
-
Jeff,
I know the Cards prefer trades to signing free agents, but doens't it make more sense to spend money in FA (not big money) and hold onto the prospects and hope some emerge vs seeing them prosper elsewhere...i.e. the Arozerena /Gallen/ Alcantara effect
e.g. people talk about trading Gorman and O'Neil like they can't do their jobs but it's more a matter of getting experience and staying healthy.
I think signing some proven bats like Brantley and/or Conforto on short-term high AAV and Vaquez for catcher and Quintana will allow us to hold onto our young/players that are long-term assets and then we can lock up the productive young players like the Braves have done.
That seems like a better model for sustained success since we will never play in the deep end of FA (nor should we unless it's a really young player).... -
Generally speaking, what you say is how the Cardinals operate. But . . . there is some overlap with young players and there are some needs that can't be filled internally. So the Cardinals will look into some trades and deal from players where they know they can't keep everybody. For instance, there is some reason to believe that Moises Gomez is a legit prospect now and that's one more young slugger.
-
Hey, Gordo.
Correct me if I'm mistaken, good scribe. But the Cards acquired Drew VerHagen a year ago based not on his performance in Japan per se (it was quite mediocre, with an ERA near 4.00), but instead due to his high spin rates. And now, even though VerHagen was indisputably terrible in the major leagues, they continue to retain him.
Are we down a very deep and dark rabbit hole here, when it comes to the Cardinals & Marmol evaluating pitchers? It feels like a failure who fails in the right way (high K's, or even merely high spin rates) will get opportunities/responsibilities that a success who succeeds in the *wrong* way does not. (Cough, Jake Woodford, cough.) By the way, if anyone wants to know why Woodford was so effective in 2022 compared to the year before, they can go to the very cool Brooks Baseball website and check his pitch location maps. In 2021 he left pitches over the middle of the plate too much, and had merely average results. In 2022, Jake was on the edges, in, out, up, down. (Kyle Lohse was a lot like that, in his late prime.) -
-
Jake Woodford learned to pitch. True enough. And he added more bite, because, yes, the team did not like his spin metrics earlier in the season. VerHagen is still on the roster because he is still on the payroll for a second contract year. But Marmol got more than a little frustrated with him. Spin rates are great, but they don't matter if you pitch defensively.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Buck is the perfect manager for a team has a feckless front office because the man loves controlling EVERYTHING. And he is a smart, smart guy. Fitting Buck into how the Cardinals run things . . . uh, no. Tony La Russa was optimal because Walt Jocketty empowered him and he had enough clout to fend off the encroachment of the analytics crowd for the bulk of his time here.
-
I am seeing comps for Walker like Dave Winfield - that would be fantastic but let's get at least one LH bat in the OF to compliment the lineup.
Would you take a chance on Bellinger - who will probably get released, or prefer Brantley or Conforto as hitters.
Bellinger is a good CF, so would you accept him as a CF option that you could bat down in the order.
They need a #5 hitter desperately... thats why I like Brantley, then Coforto who both play a passable OF -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hey, Gordo. Thanks for chatting.
Jesse Winker's career OPS v. righties is nearly .900, so that's really, really good. (Don't know how much it's inflated by Cincy's home park, but anyway it's real good.) But he's as terrible an outfielder as Joc Pederson and Kyle Schwarber. He's almost as bad in the outfield as Juan Yepez. And I'm afraid I just don't trust Ollie Marmol to use Winker exclusively as a DH. Not after the way he played Yepez dozens of times in the field in 2022. Please tell me I shouldn't be such a skeptic, re the manager's evaluative judgements. Tell me he's smarter now, after a year of experience. -